class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide # When the election
rains out
and how bad weather excludes
marginal voters from turning out ## MPSA 2022 ### Søren Damsbo-Svendsen
sdas
@ifs.ku.dk
### Kasper Møller Hansen
kmh
@ifs.ku.dk
### Department of Political Science
University of Copenhagen ### 08 April 2022 --- layout: true <br> .pull-left[ <br> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#media/election-rainout_frontpage.png" width="55%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] --- .pull-right[<br> **RQ: How does Election Day weather affect voters' decision to turn out for election — and for whom?**<br> - Electoral turnout is a key __indicator of health and legitimacy__ of democracy - Focus on rainfall: does it reduce turnout? - *Mechanism:* **Cost of voting** (and possibly __mood__) ] --- .pull-right[<br> First, we did a **meta-analysis:** - Rainfall effect - 33 studies - Mixed designs and results - (But) avg. rainfall effect:<br>**-0.76 %-points per cm** ] --- .pull-right[<br> Secondly, we did a new **stand-alone study** with great data: 1. Revisit **rainfall-turnout** thesis 2. Explore **other weather** variables 3. **Nonlinear** weather effects 4. **Heterogeneous** weather effects ] --- layout: false # Data: turnout records Individual turnout records for 4,549,145* Danish voters age 18-80 -- - **Validated** registry data - → high quality - [handful of previous studies] -- - (Almost) **complete electorate** - → huge N - [first study] -- - **Repeated measurements** at 2013 and 2017 local elections - → voter panel - [first study] ??? - Missing data on ~1% (2013) and ~9% (2017) of eligible voters because of non-participating municipalities. - Exclusion of ~3% early voting and voters above age 80 --- # Data: objective weather observations <img src="data:image/png;base64,#media/weather-stations.png" width="1000px" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> - Voters' home coordinates matched with **166 weather stations** - __Individual weather__ *triangulated* from three nearest weather stations --- # Design and models .pull-left[ **(1) Pooled model** - Regression of turnout on *rainfall*, *sunshine*, *temperature* with municipality and election FEs - cross-sectional variation - assumption of (conditional) as-if randomness in assignment of weather ] -- .pull-right[ **(2) Panel model** - Regression of turnout on *rainfall*, *sunshine*, *temperature* with voter and election FEs (TWFE) - within-unit variation over time - assumption of no selection into treatment from *time-varying* individual-level factors that shape where one lives<br>(i.e., local weather) - stronger basis for causal inference,<br>first in the literature ] ??? - __Additional controls:__ (individual) age, gender, living close to coast, municipal population size, share of non-Western immigrants, and closeness of the election --- class: title-slide, center, middle # Results --- class: middle ## Result I: Negative rainfall effect - **Rainfall** — "bad weather" — reduces probability of voting - **-0.84 %-points** per centimeter rain, on average - Substantial difference between panel model ↑ and pooled model --- class: middle ## Result II: Positive sunshine effect - __Sunshine__ — "nice weather" — also boosts turnout - **1.52 %-points** diff. between max and min observed sunshine --- class: middle ## Result III: Nonlinear rainfall effect .left-column[ <br> - **Rainfall effect** increases with more rain - No effect at zero rain, approx. **-3.5 %-points** at max - (Sunshine effect is not nonlinear) ] .right-column[ <img src="data:image/png;base64,#media/nonlinear_panel.png" width="1000px" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] --- class: middle ## Result IV: Stronger effects on marginal voters - Important Q → **Are marginal voter groups more susceptible?** - **Potentially major issue** for democratic representation - We focus on **young voters** in their twenties who have - left their childhood home - not yet established a solid voting habit ??? Marginal voters: "*those whose decisions to turn out are sensitive to exogenous factors*" (Fowler 2015: 205) <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#media/turnout_by_age.png" alt="'The rollercoaster ride of turnout and age' (descriptive turnout by age at KV13-KV17)" width="1000px" /> <p class="caption">'The rollercoaster ride of turnout and age' (descriptive turnout by age at KV13-KV17)</p> </div> --- ## Result IV: Stronger effects on marginal voters <img src="data:image/png;base64,#media/interaction_panel.png" width="65%" height="65%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> - Young voters are influenced up to **seven times more susceptible** by the weather - **No effect** on first-time voters in *first cohort* - **Very strong effect** on *second and third cohort* --- background-color: #ECECF2 # In sum We revisit the question of how Election Day weather affects turnout with<br><br>(a) a **meta-analysis** of the rainfall-turnout thesis and<br><br>(b) a **stand-alone study** ↓ -- - __<font color='#6295CD'>rainfall</font>__ *does* reduce turnout - effect comparable to avg in existing literature - effect is **nonlinear** - **sunshine** also increases turnout - **marginal voters** — young voters without robust turnout habit — are *much more susceptible* --- layout: true class: center, middle background-color: #ECECF2 --- # Thanks for the attention <br> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#media/rain-election.png" width="50%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> <span style="color:grey;font-size:9pt;">Edward Linsmier—Getty Images 2014, time.com/3554884/2014-election-weather-forecast</span> --- <br> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#media/interaction_pool.png" width="1000px" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- <img src="data:image/png;base64,#media/weather-turnout-table.png" width="80%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- <img src="data:image/png;base64,#media/election-rainout_meta.png" width="53%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" />